Global Population Intervention and China’s New Choice: Beyond the Universal Two-Child Policy#br#

Population Research ›› 2016, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 99-110.

Global Population Intervention and China’s New Choice: Beyond the Universal Two-Child Policy#br#

Liu Shuang¹,Zhu Yu²,Zheng Lan³

Center for Population and Development Studies,Renmin University of China;School of Sociology and Population Studies,Renmin University of China

Published:2016-11-29 Online:2016-11-29
About Author:Liu Shuang is Professor，Center for Population and Development Studies，Renmin University of China; Zhu Yu is PhD Candidate，and Zheng Lan is Master Student，School of Sociology and Population Studies，Renmin University of China．

全球人口干预与“新的中国选择”——超越全面两孩政策的思考

刘爽¹，朱宇²，郑澜³

中国人民大学人口与发展研究中心，中国人民大学社会与人口学院

作者简介:刘爽，中国人民大学人口与发展研究中心副主任、教授; 朱宇，中国人民大学社会与人口学院博士研究生; 郑澜，中国人民大学社会与人口学院硕士研究生。
基金资助:
教育部人文社科基地重大课题“中国特色人口转变道路的理论研究”(项目号:05JJD840146)

Abstract

Abstract: With a global perspective，drawing upon data related to population policy as well as the reproductive health/family planning published by the United Nations，this article examines the general trend and characteristics of population regulations and policy intervention across the world，and discusses the implications for the future reform of China’s family planning policy．We find that，in the past 30 years，regarding population policies in the fields of population growth，fertility level，aging，reproductive health/family planning as well as internal rural-urban migration，the number and proportion of countries with no population intervention in the world have considerably decreased．Such intervention has become a major world trend．More than 90% of the world’s countries or regions are currently practicing family planning，showing the universality，inclusiveness and strong vitality of this policy．The promotion of reproductive health has greatly enriched and expanded the traditional family planning practice．This article suggests that China’s family planning policy should promote reform and innovation in distinguishing basic concepts of population policy，integrating services，supporting external policies and bringing into full play the role of social organizations．

Keywords: Population Policy, Reproductive Health, Family Planning, Population Intervention, Universal Two-Child Policy

摘要： 文章基于全球视角,利用联合国等机构发布的人口政策及生殖健康/计划生育数据,阐述国际社会人口调控与政策干预的总体变化趋势及特点,并在此基础上对未来中国计划生育的改革发展进行了思考,发现:近30多年来,在人口增长、生育水平、老龄化、生殖健康/计划生育以及国内乡-城迁移等人口政策的各个领域,全球采取不干预立场的国家数量和比例均在大幅下降,人口干预是世界性的时代潮流。全球超过90%的国家或地区都在践行计划生育,展现出这项实践的普适性、包容性和强大生命力。生殖健康促进极大地丰富和拓展了传统计划生育实践。建议中国的计划生育在人口政策等基本概念的区分、整合服务、"外围"政策支撑以及发挥社会组织"实体性"作用等方面推进改革创新。

关键词: 人口政策, 生殖健康, 计划生育, 人口干预, 全面两孩

Liu Shuang, Zhu Yu, Zheng Lan. Global Population Intervention and China’s New Choice: Beyond the Universal Two-Child Policy#br#[J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(6): 99-110.

刘爽, 朱宇, 郑澜. 全球人口干预与“新的中国选择”——超越全面两孩政策的思考[J]. 人口研究, 2016, 40(6): 99-110.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://rkyj.ruc.edu.cn/EN/

https://rkyj.ruc.edu.cn/EN/Y2016/V40/I6/99

[1]	Wang Peian. Exploration and Practice of China's Population Development by the Communist Party of China [J]. Population Research, 2021, 45(5): 3-9.
[2]	Shi Zhilei, Lyu Jie. The Universal Two-Child Policy and Changing Fertility Level of Floating Population [J]. Population Research, 2021, 45(2): 13-29.
[3]	Wei Zhixin, Yu Dian, Liu Hongyan. Trends and Characteristics of Induced Abortion among Married Women of Reproductive Ages in China:A Study Based on 1997-2017 China Fertility Surveys [J]. Population Research, 2020, 44(6): 79-95.
[4]	Song Shujie, Lu Yang. A Review of Studies on China's Population and Macroeconomics Issues [J]. Population Research, 2020, 44(6): 114-125.
[5]	Ding Jinhong,Cheng Chen,Wu Hang and Zhang Weijia. Factors Determining Fertility Change and the Influence of Family Planning Policy Adjustments #br# in East China: An Analysis Based on 2017 Fertility Survey [J]. Population Research, 2019, 43(5): 17-27.
[6]	Yu Xiao, Zhu Yingrun and Kan Xinglong. Urban and Rural Differences in Marriage Squeeze of Chinese Men [J]. Population Research, 2019, 43(4): 3-16.
[7]	Wang Peian. The Two-Child Policy and China's Long-Term Balanced Population Development [J]. Population Research, 2017, 41(4): 3-7.
[8]	Lu Wanjun, Zhang Binbin. The Effect of China’s Family Planning Policy on Women’s Social Status [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(4): 21-34.
[9]	Zhai Zhenwu, Li Long, Chen Jiaju. Accumulated Couples and Extra Births under the Universal Two-Child Policy [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(4): 35-51.
[10]	Gui Shixun. Impact of the Two-Child Policy on Active Coping with Population Ageing [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(4): 60-65.
[11]	Lv Hongping, Cui Hongwei, Yang Xin. The Family Planning Ｒeward and Assistance Policies under the Two-Child Policy [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(3): 82-89.
[12]	Wang Peian. On the Two-Child Policy in China [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(1): 3-7.
[13]	Zhang Xiaoqing, Huang Caihong, Zhang Qiang, Chen Shuangshuang, Fan Qipeng. Fertility Intention for the Second Child under the Selective and Universal Two-Child Policies: Comparisons and Implications [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(1): 87-97.
[14]	Wang Peian. On the Two-Child Policy in China [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(1): 3-7.
[15]	Zhang Xiaoqing, Huang Caihong, Zhang Qiang, Chen Shuangshuang, Fan Qipeng. Fertility Intention for the Second Child under the Selective and Universal Two-Child Policies: Comparisons and Implications [J]. Population Research, 2016, 40(1): 87-97.