人口研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 52-67.

• 深入学习贯彻党的二十届四中全会精神——加快建设健康中国 • 上一篇    下一篇

“围退期”就业—退休轨迹分化如何塑造老年健康差异?——基于生命历程视角的实证分析

朱火云, 陈仕强, 龚华芳   

  • 出版日期:2026-03-29 发布日期:2026-03-29
  • 作者简介:朱火云,暨南大学公共管理学院副教授;陈仕强,英国谢菲尔德大学社会学、政治学和国际关系学院博士研究生;龚华芳,暨南大学护理学院副研究员。电子邮箱:huoyun_z@126.com
  • 基金资助:本研究得到国家社会科学基金重大项目“民生发展的思想源流及其当代实践研究”(24&ZD141)、广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“城市老年友好型社区建设的合作生产机制研究”(GD23YSH07)、广州市哲学社会科学发展“十四五”规划项目“广州积极应对人口老龄化研究:退休医护党员参与社区老年健康服务建设研究”(2022GZGJ180)的支持。

How Does Employment-Retirement Trajectory Differentiation during the Peri-retirement Period Shape Later-Life Health Disparities? Evidence from a Life Course Perspective

Zhu Huoyun, Chen Shiqiang, Gong Huafang   

  • Published:2026-03-29 Online:2026-03-29
  • About Author:Zhu Huoyun is Associate Professor, School of Public Administration, Jinan University; Chen Shiqiang is PhD Candidate, School of Sociological Studies, Politics and International Relations, University of Sheffield; Gong Huafang is Associate Researcher, School of Nursing, Jinan University. Email:huoyun_z@126.com

摘要:基于生命历程视角,本文利用中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2011~2020年6期纵贯数据,采用序列分析和聚类分析方法识别“围退期”(45~63岁)人群的就业—退休轨迹类型,并结合马尔可夫多状态模型与夏普利分解法,估计各轨迹类型的预期寿命和健康预期寿命差异及其形成机制。研究表明,“围退期”人群的就业—退休轨迹显著分化,非农正规就业者多遵循制度化退休路径,非农非正规就业与农业劳动者则“无休止”劳动,长期未就业者最早退出劳动力市场;各轨迹类型间预期寿命差距显著,非农正规就业—完全退休型的预期寿命优势明显,且存在“性别健康—生存悖论”;健康差异主要源于健康状态转移差异,即各轨迹类型间健康衰退速度、恢复能力及死亡风险的系统性分化。研究对理解老年群体健康差异、稳妥实施渐进式延迟法定退休年龄政策、推进健康中国战略具有重要价值。

关键词: 生命历程, 围退期, 就业—退休轨迹, 健康差异

Abstract: Population ageing in China has heightened concerns about health equality in later life. This study investigates how heterogeneous employment-retirement trajectories during the peri-retirement period shape later-life health disparities in China. Employment history and retirement arrangements are critical social determinants of health, while existing studies treat retirement as a discrete event rather than a dynamic process. From a life course perspective, we argue that health disparities in old age reflect the cumulative effects of distinct pathways out of the labour force. Using six waves (2011-2020) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we focus on the peri-retirement period (ages 45-63), which spans the statutory retirement ages in China. We apply sequence analysis and cluster analysis to identify typical employment-retirement trajectories, and estimate trajectory-specific life expectancy (LE) and healthy life expectancy (HLE) using Markov multistate models. To examine mechanisms, we use Shapley decomposition with counterfactual one-sided replacement to assess the contributions of health deterioration, recovery, and mortality to observed HLE disparities. We identify distinct trajectories by gender. Among men, four trajectories emerge: sustained agricultural work, formal non-agricultural employment with full retirement, long-term non-employment with full retirement, and sustained informal non-agricultural work. Among women, three trajectories emerge, with no equivalent sustained informal non-agricultural trajectory, reflecting gendered constraints in labour market participation. Substantial health disparities exist across these trajectory groups. Women have higher LE than men but slightly lower HLE, consistent with the gender health-survival paradox. The formal non-agricultural employment-full retirement group shows the most favourable LE and HLE, whereas the long-term non-employed group fares worst. As age rises, LE disparities across trajectories remain stable, while HLE disparities converge. Shapley decomposition shows that health deterioration and recovery capacity are the primary drivers of HLE disparities.

This study advances the life course research by reframing labor force exit as a dynamic process. Methodologically, it uses sequence analysis, multistate modelling, and counterfactual decomposition into a unified framework for trajectory identification, association estimation, and mechanism testing. The findings show that employment-retirement trajectories embody cumulative differences in income, social insurance coverage, and health resilience. In China's context, where social insurance schemes are stratified by employment type and sector, these trajectories reflect systematic differences in access to institutional protection. The results carry policy implications for China's ongoing gradual delay of statutory retirement ages. Targeted labor market support should be extended to peri-retirement workers, especially those in informal employment and long-term non-employment. Expanding social insurance coverage for disadvantaged groups and reducing institutional stratification in benefits could enhance health recovery capacity. Addressing gendered disadvantages requires recognising women's unpaid care work and ensuring more fair pension entitlements.

Keywords: Life Course, Peri-retirement Period, Employment-Retirement Trajectory, Health Disparities