人口研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 86-103.

• 人工智能与人口发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

人工智能关注、劳动力技能结构与就业需求创造——来自上市企业人工智能招聘数据的经验证据

孙猛, 林建鑫   

  • 出版日期:2026-01-29 发布日期:2026-01-29
  • 作者简介:孙猛,吉林大学东北亚研究中心副教授;林建鑫(通讯作者),吉林大学东北亚学院博士研究生。电子邮箱:linjx24@mails.jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本研究得到国家社会科学基金重大项目“以人口高质量发展支撑中国式现代化的理论与政策研究”(24&ZD157)的支持。

Artificial Intelligence Focus, Labor Skill Structure, and Employment Demand: Evidence from Recruitment Data of Listed Companies

Sun Meng, Lin Jianxin   

  • Published:2026-01-29 Online:2026-01-29
  • About Author:Sun Meng is Associate Professor, Northeast Asian Research Center, Jilin University; Lin Jianxin (Corresponding Author) is PhD Candidate, Northeast Asian Studies College, Jilin University. Email:linjx24@mails.jlu.edu.cn

摘要:在人工智能重塑就业市场的背景下,基于上市企业年报文本数据构建人工智能关注指标,结合网络招聘大数据开展实证研究。研究发现,企业人工智能关注显著地创造了相关就业需求,体现为招聘岗位种类与人员规模的同步扩张。该效应受到企业内部劳动力结构与数量禀赋的调节,高技能偏向的企业通过强化技术适配性进一步创造就业需求,劳动力雇佣数量配置低效的企业可通过人工智能关注矫正低效率,扩大就业需求。机制分析表明,企业更依赖外部招聘而非内部培训以适应技术变革。就业需求创造效应在规模较小、非制造业及人工智能发展水平较高的企业中更明显。人工智能关注也引致用工结构变化,表现为薪酬分配呈均衡提升趋势,学历要求向本科集中、经验门槛提高。

关键词: 人工智能关注, 劳动力技能结构, 就业需求

Abstract: In the context of artificial intelligence (AI) transforming labor markets, this study shifts focus from the downstream effects of AI adoption, such as job displacement, to the earlier stage of corporate strategic thinking. We analyze Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2023. A company-level measure of AI focus is constructed using text analysis in annual reports, capturing the company's AI focus. We precisely measure employment demand by leveraging large-scale online recruitment data from major Chinese platforms. This allows us to track real-time dynamics in AI-related job postings, including variety, scale, required education, experience, and salary offerings. The research examines how a company's AI focus influences AI-related employment demand.

Empirical findings show that greater AI focus significantly increases both the variety and number of AI job postings, confirming that it creates new demand. This effect depends on a company's internal labor conditions. Companies with a higher proportion of high-skilled labor see stronger job demand creation due to better technological fit. In contrast, companies with inefficient labor allocation use AI focus to correct this imbalance, leading to more employment demand. A key mechanism is that companies rely more on external hiring than on internal training to adapt to technological change. This suggests AI focus may crowd out investment in retraining current staff, thereby generating external demand. The job demand creation effect is stronger in smaller companies, in non-manufacturing industries, and in regions with high-level AI development. Furthermore, AI focus changes the structure of labor demand: it concentrates educational requirements on bachelor's degrees, raises experience requirements, and leads to a balanced increase in salary levels across average, minimum, and maximum wages. This indicates trends of both polarization and inclusive upgrading of job quality.

This study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it introduces a front-end cognitive perspective by analyzing strategic attention before actual technology adoption, offering early signals of AI's labor market impact. Second, it develops and tests a three-part framework explaining how AI focus affects employment demand by correcting labor misallocation, by leveraging high-skilled labors for better adaptation, and by crowding out internal training investments. This advances beyond simple views of technology replacing jobs. Third, it combines text-based measures of company strategy with detailed, real-time recruitment data, providing strong micro-level evidence on AI-driven labor demand.

The results have important policy implications. First, governments can promote a technology-friendly environment and provide technical interpretation to raise corporate AI awareness, using its job creation potential to ease structural employment pressures. Second, because companies strongly prefer external hiring, governments should guide them to balance recruitment with internal training to avoid over-relying on external human capital. Companies with labor imbalances should optimize their labor structure, while high-skilled companies should use their adaptive advantage. Third, the shift toward bachelor's degrees, greater experience, and balanced wage growth calls for corresponding educational reforms. Governments should guide universities to update AI-related curricula and strengthen continuing education to help labors adapt to new job demands.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Focus, Labor Skill Structure, Employment Demand