Population Research ›› 2026, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 98-111.

• Population and Society • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Conflict between Household Fertility Choices and Societal Population Demand under the Deepening Social Division of Labor: With a Discussion on Firms' Shared Responsibility for Fertility Costs

Wang Jinying, Qu Bianbian   

  • Published:2026-05-29 Online:2026-05-29
  • About Author:Wang Jinying is Professor, School of Economics, Research Center for Population and Health Development, Hebei University; Qu Bianbian is PhD Candidate, School of Economics, Hebei University. Email:wangjy369@263.net

社会分工深化过程中家庭生育选择与社会人口需求的矛盾——兼论企业在生育成本共担中的责任

王金营, 曲变变   

  • 作者简介:王金营,河北大学经济学院、人口与健康发展研究中心教授;曲变变,河北大学经济学院博士研究生。电子邮箱:wangjy369@263.net
  • 基金资助:
    本文得到研究阐释党的十九届五中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目“增强综合实力的中国人口长期发展战略研究”(21ZDA108)的支持。

Abstract: Persistently declining fertility has become a major demographic issue in post-industrial societies. After the completion of the first demographic transition, fertility rates in many countries did not stabilize around the replacement level, but continued to decline and exhibited characteristics of the second demographic transition. Household fertility choices, shaped by constraints of cost, time, and risk, have gradually diverged from society's long-term needs for labor supply, market capacity, and balanced population structure. Explaining the mechanism underlying this divergence is the central concern of this paper. From the perspective of the deepening social division of labor, this paper combines theoretical analysis with model-based deduction and traces the historical evolution from traditional agricultural society to the early stage of industrialization and then to the post-industrial stage. It examines the relationships among household functions, firm behavior, and population-scale demand under different forms of division of labor, and reveals the mechanism through which a structural contradiction emerges between household fertility choices and societal population demand.

The study finds that, in traditional agricultural society, the family performed multiple functions of production, consumption, old-age support, and risk protection. A larger household size helped strengthen household production capacity, labor organization, and intergenerational support, making relatively high fertility economically rational under conditions of low productivity and limited external support. In the early stage of industrialization, labor-intensive production and the expansion of intra-firm division of labor increased social demand for labor. Meanwhile, rising household income, declining mortality, and relatively low childrearing costs jointly sustained high fertility. Thus, expanding labor demand and high household fertility formed a positive coupling relationship during the transitional phase of the first demographic transition. In the post-industrial stage, however, the continuous deepening of the social division of labor has externalized household functions of production, security, and care, weakened individuals' economic and functional dependence on the family, and increased the time cost, opportunity cost, and quality-investment pressure of childbearing. As a result, the household's optimal number of children declines. At the same time, firm operation and socioeconomic development still rely on labor supply, consumer markets, and product-variety expansion supported by population size. Society therefore retains a long-term demand for population stability and structural balance. This gives rise to a structural divergence between households' rational low-fertility choices and societal population demand.

The contribution of this paper lies in explaining persistent low fertility and the second demographic transition within the framework of the evolving social division of labor. It further points out, from the perspective of firms' dependence on population size and market capacity, that there is a systematic mismatch between the social benefits of population reproduction and the private costs borne by households. Addressing this contradiction requires shifting fertility costs from being borne solely by households to being reasonably shared by the state, firms, and households. In particular, firms should assume greater responsibility in the fertility support system, so that the benefits and costs of childbearing can be more fairly distributed across social actors and a more coordinated relationship can be established between household fertility decisions and the long-term needs of social development.

Keywords: Fertility Support, Social Division of Labor, Low Fertility Rate, Population Size, Corporate Responsibility

摘要: 为深刻理解第二次人口转变的根源并探寻低生育率治理路径,本文引入社会分工深化因素,采用理论分析与模型推演相结合的方法,分析家庭生育选择与社会人口需求的矛盾形成的内在机制。研究发现:工业化初期至成长期,企业内部分工和生产扩张提高了社会劳动力需求,带动家庭收入改善,加上这一阶段子女生育成本相对较低,从而支撑了较高生育水平,社会劳动力需求扩张与家庭高生育选择之间由此形成正向耦合;工业化成熟期及后工业化阶段,社会分工深化使个体对家庭的依赖减弱并推动家庭功能外部化,抬升生育成本和子女质量投入压力,推动第二次人口转变,与此同时,企业运行和经济社会发展对人口规模所支撑的劳动力供给、消费市场容量和需求多样化形成更高依赖,由此形成家庭理性少生与社会人口需求之间的结构性矛盾。现代社会持续低生育率的深层根源在于人口再生产的社会收益与家庭私人成本之间存在系统性错位,破解这一困局,需要建立国家、企业与家庭共担生育成本的机制,并强化企业在生育支持体系中的责任。

关键词: 生育支持, 社会分工, 低生育率, 人口规模, 企业责任